About Me

Name: realetybytes
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

It's Not A Health-Care Bill, It's The American Holocaust Act!

If you thought the Nazis killed a lot of people, hold on tight, you ain't seen nothin' yet!
In his quest to be the best, THE ONE is out to kill as many of the elderly as he can. 
We know he tried to keep medical treatment from newborns he did not approve of, now THE ONE, as he told a woman on national TV, (concerning whether her mother would get tratment under his plan), thinks there should be no treatment for the elderly, "ah, umm, give her a pain pill", was his compassionate answer.
Former Colorado Governor Richard Lamm laid out THE ONEs position perfectly, it was Lamms contention that the elderly, "had a duty to die"! Empathy on the Supreme Court is OK, but not in THE ONEs medical plans.
Rahm Emanuells brother, another of THE ONEs advisors, wants elderly care stopped, along with many of THE ONEs other advisors, some in the name of population control.
Paul Watson and John P Holdren are two of his top science advisors. The want a "PLANETARY REGIME" to kill as many people as possible to control the population. The elderly are at the top of their list, along with forced implants to keep people from getting pregnant.
Nice work Dems, when this is over, no one will remember anyone killing a piddling 6 million.
If you have anything to say to your relatives, I'd say it soon.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hates, I Mean Gates: "Move On", (quick before the tapes get out!)

You've got to hand it to THE ONE. His friends are some of the most entertaining, newsworthy Racist, America-Hating, Terrorist Frauds we have seen for a long time.
This latest FOTO, (Friend Of THE ONE), the racist phoney professor Hates, makes Ward Churchill look legitimate, (and that's not easy to do!)
Hates, (he may call himself professor, I reserve that for people that actually earned a degree or are otherwise qualified for that position), wants to, "move on" now. After his initial attacks, from the height of his indignation, claiming he was so abused, he now wants to, "move on".
Why? He had such a great civil-rights lawsuit, why would he back off? As Arsenio used to say, "hmmmmmm?'
Could it be that as soon as the police announced they were mulling the release of the on-scene communication tapes between the officer and headquarters, what little cognitive intelligence he possesses kicked in and reminded him of how he would sound on said tapes? Was that "shot across the bow" from the police enough to make him realize he better shut up, because he sounded just like the racist Rev. Wright, maybe worse?
Or did they play them for THE ONE, and he realized that his racist buddy left him holding the bag after telling him it was all a racist cops fault, and did THE ONE make him back off?
Either way, this racist fraud Rev. Wright wannabe certainly did not greet the officer with the big smile he is now projecting to the news media, in his attempts to get them to "move on".
As to this, "move on" crapola, have you noticed that since the first use of that phrase, trying to get the disgusting perjurer Bill Clinton out of trouble, it is mostly liberals, democrats or racist FOTOs that want to, "move on"? (Not to say the right-wingers don't get in trouble, but 95% of the time, they resign).
As I stated in a previous blog, if THE ONE would just tell us where all his friends live, no one would accidentally happen upon any racist, america-hating, terrorist frauds without warning. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another Of THE ONEs Lovely Friends, What Else Is New?

Maybe if THE ONE would just tell us where all his friends live, like Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers and the so-called "prof". Gates, no one would walk up unexpectedly on America hating, racist frauds.

Ron Reale
realetybytes@yahoo.com
http://realetybytes.townhall.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Will They Fine The Illegals?

As we know, we are about to be screwed by THE ONE yet again, with a  $2,500 fine for not carrying health insurance. My question is, if health insurance is mandatory, what about the illegal aliens? How will they be held accountable? If they are going to keep getting a free ride, why does that not violate the 14th amendment equal protection rule?
Are we being charged so much as citizens because we have to pay for criminals?
Why are we not confiscating 15% of all money sent back to mexico, and using it to pay for an insurance policy for mexican nationals?
I have no problem with Americans paying for their health care, as long as they stop treating those not paying.
Why are we not confiscating 15% of all the money sent to mexico to pay for the schooling of these criminals children, who are bankrupting our system?
THE ONE has no problem stealing American companies and Americans hard-earned monies, how about going after the leaches in the system and giving Americans a break?
THAT would lower our costs, and make our schools better and our streets safer.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thank God For the Hate Crimes Act...

...it will soon be our only tool in the fight against terrorists, at least until the ACLU and THE ONE put in the terrorist exemptions.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sotomayor: Can She Answer Honestly?

THE ONEs Supreme Court nominee, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, is about to go through her Senate confirmation hearings. Given the opportunity, these are the questions I would like to put to the nominee.
 
"Judge Sotomayor, if, during Clarence Thomas's confirmation hearings, it was established that he belonged to, represented or supported in any way, the Black Panthers, would he have been confirmed?"
"Judge Sotomayor, if, during Samuel Alito's confirmation hearings, it was established that he belonged to, represented or supported in any way the KKK, would he have been confirmed?" 
"Judge Sotomayor, you are associated with the racist group La Raza, (its very name means THE RACE, like it's so special), that does not recognize the borders of this country, and has as one of its objectives, the silent takeover of the southwest United States through sheer numbers of illegal immigrants."
"Judge Sotomayor, if you have any respect for our laws, how can you associate yourself in any way, shape or form, with this racist organization?"
"Judge Sotomayor do you think you should get a pass on your racist views of the merits of being a "latina", and your obvious disdain for the experience of others"?
"Judge Sotomayor, do you, or do you not, aspire to the ideal that no matter what judge someone appears before, the justice received should be the same, under the law?"
"If so, what difference does your being a latina have, and why would that make you better then the non latinas and non latinos, as you have repeatedly stated?"
"If not, could you tell us how a legal system can work when the judges make up the rules according to how they feel that day, or their morning experience, instead of basing decisions on the written law?"
"Judge Sotomayor, the group to which you aspire has reversed you 2/3rds, (66%), of the times, with sometimes scathing decisions. You yourself have said you are an affirmative action baby, who would not be here if not for special considerations putting you ahead of more qualified people, that you did not have the best grades. Wouldn't the prudent thing to do, be to withdraw and allow a more competent, qualified person to fill this position, while you work on the [all men are created equal] thing with which you have so much trouble ?" 
Thank you, Judge Sotomayor, better luck next time. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obamas "Feel Good" Statements Both Sophomoric and Deadly

It takes someone with no respect for American values or
historic greatness to make the ridiculous statements THE ONE has been spouting from the White House.
 
This intellectually vapid boy-leader speaks about some, "universally recognized right to peaceful protest". What a dolt.
 
Mr. Foreign-Born-Usurper-with-no-understanding-of-Americas-greatness, let me explain something:
 
The right you are trying to bestow on the world is a right people in America fought and died for. You're trying to diminish that sacrifice by telling the world that they have the same special rights that Americans have.
 
This is ignorance, at best, or stupidity, at worst.
 
Our Declaration of Independence made Americans free, not the world. "All men are created equal" was meant for the American experience.
 
We were certainly not telling the Chinese they were free to do what they want!
 
If they got to America, they would be treated equally, but it was not our business or intent to dissolve all other world governments.
 
No one in any country has any rights, philosophically or realistically, other then those their Government permits. To tell them different is a cruel lie, which belittles Americans sacrifices.
 
What it is that you don't understand, as a Foreign-Born-Usurper-with-no-understanding-of-Americas-greatness, is that THAT is what makes our culture better then the rest, and why we have a right to our world leader status.
 
Our rights come from the Almighty Creator to the people, and through the people, to the government.
 
Americans have the rights you want to share with the world.
 
Unfortunately, Mr. Foreign-Born-Usurper-with-no-understanding-of-Americas-greatness, Governments like Iran and North Korea missed the memo about their citizens having American rights. 
 
Your insulting statements to the contrary are getting people killed.
 
Bill Clinton needed a sex scandal and perjury conviction to become an embarrassment on the world stage. You just needed to show up and spout your 1960's conflict-resolution claptrap.
 
Americans are not "world citizens". We are Americans. The world wants what we have. 
 
Americans are not dying trying to leave and break into other countries for a better life.
 
It is foreigners, like your parents, Mr. Foreign-Born-Usurper-with-no-understanding-of-Americas-greatness, that are dying to get here for the rights you are dismissivly trying to hand out. Foreigners fighting and dying getting here for our rights is what puts the lie to the "multi-cultural equality" myth.
 
Some cultures are better than others, and ours is far and away better than most.   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This, "Dear Illiterate Representative, You're Fired," letter...

...  should be printed out, signed by you and as many of your neighbors and like-minded friends, and sent to our so-called representatives, before the next election.


To Whom It May Concern,
Dear Candidate,

Recently, a number of extremely complicated, incredibly large and very important bills have passed the House and the Senate, without having been read by the representatives.
 
We wish to make this perfectly clear.
 
If you are an elected official, representing me in Washington, and you sign bills in MY name without reading those bills, then you are fired.

I/we will work to remove anyone who is so arrogant as to sign laws they know nothing about.

I do not sign contracts or any legal papers before I know how much it will cost.
 
You think you can do this because you aren't paying the bills, so you do not care about the cost.
 
You are spending our money, and now you are spending our grandchildrens money!

Regardless of party, you will be fired. Your treasonous actions are an insult to working Americans across this country.

We don't mean the 4-people-to-a-job union thug buddies you are so fond of protecting, we mean working Americans, the ones whose health care plans you propose to tax, while not taxing your union thug buddies.

You do not represent us, and we will work to see that you are not elected, or re-elected.

Your arrogance is insulting to us, you have no idea what it is like to live in the real world.

The difference between us is, you don't mind a system where you don't need the intelligence to read, (after all, on a yearly basis you reward your incompetant union thug buddies in the NEA while more and more students fail.), and you don't mind not reading things, (if you even have the ability).

We, on the other hand, can and do read, we will read your name on the list of representatives who didn't read what they voted for, and vote you out. 

Ron Reale
realetybytes@yahoo.com
http://realetybytes.townhall.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My Defense & Apology Letter Vs. Idiot Boss

I fired up an obsolete computer today, an 860 with 512 KB. While checking some files, I came across a (successful) letter of defense I had to write, due to an incident with my immediate supervisor, (lets call him Bruce), at my old job.
I was the Head Bartender at a catering hall in Plantation, Fl, called Rolling Hills. (If you saw Caddyshack, that is where some of it was filmed, see credits at end of film).
One busy evening, an incident occurred which caused me to force a painful realization upon the cook, who, technically was my supervisor, and took great umbrage at this personal revelation.
It may bring a smile to your face. 
 
To: CATERING OFFICE<CONNIE
From: Ron Reale      4.18.2003       
My Defense, or, The Simple Task Requested of Bruce, and Why His Failure To Fulfill and/or Attempt Said Task, Led Him To Realize, of His Own Volition, That He Is An A-hole.

On the day in question, I had a request from the Mother of either the Bride or Groom at the function (I don’t remember which), for a drink containing grapefruit juice (GJ). Realizing after checking the coolers that I had no GJ, I went to Bruce and asked for some.
Bruce stated I needed a requisition for the juice. I pointed out that:
A)    I truthfully would not know what his requisition forms looked like,
B)    I would not know where to get one immediately and,
C)    The Guest was waiting.
Bruce’s reaction was to stand in the doorway of the kitchen and pontificate upon what he saw as the cause of the problem, the failure of one of his fellow managers to follow his directives, so there was nothing he could do.
I cut short his diatribe, as it did not solve my problem. Bruce’s indifference was starting to irk me.
I tried one more time. I said, “ IF you cannot give me a bottle of juice now, so I can deal with this VIP, and write down that fact and deal with the inventory problem later, THEN you are an a-hole.
I can only assume, from his reaction, that Bruce had decided that he could not give me juice and write it down for later, so he must in fact be, an a-hole.
This self-realization must have struck Bruce hard, because he didn’t take it well.
Bruce ordered me from the kitchen.
I was good and irked by now.
I was determined that the fact that he was angered because he realized he was an a-hole, coupled with my anger at not being able to do my job in a timely manner, to the best of my abilities, because he was so unprofessional as to not care about the Guest, wasn’t costing me my nights employment, as I had done nothing out of line.
Bruce then ordered me out again, saying, “I’m not kidding”. I guess he felt it necessary to add that, because he has to know his attitude about service and this job is a joke to all the catering, banquet, and restaurant staff.
Regrettably, at this point, I told him to go and accomplish something that, to my knowledge, is not physically possible.
I am truthfully sorry about that.
Predictably, Bruce’s anger grew. Not at hearing the phrase, because the kitchen staff uses it regularly on the banquet and or restaurant staff.
Whatever the reason, Bruce ordered me out a few more times, and I went about getting what I needed for the Guest, repeating my anatomically impossible suggestion to Bruce every time he ordered me out. (I went to the bar and got GJ for the guest and continued the evening uneventfully).
Bruce, on the other hand, went after someone else, so his self-realization would not be the most important thing he had to report the next day.

Not being a trained physician or muscular therapist, I had no right to offer anatomical suggestions to another employee, and I shall endeavor to never again offer unsolicited physical advice.

Ronald Reale
 
I was never contacted again about the matter, and worked there until it closed the following year.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrat Party History of Racism, Stand and Be Proud...

Roger Hedgcock has written a great article on the history of the Racist Democrat party, which can be found in its entirety at
 
 
What is stunning is the reeducation, (or no education), being taught in government schools that hides all of this from the public. Why any person of color would even talk to a democrat is beyond me.  Here is a small excerpt of this excellent, insightful and troubling history of the democrat party:
 
"Principled Republicans knowing their history would have authored a resolution reciting the facts that the Republican Party was formed, among other reasons, to oppose slavery and that the Republican Party and its first President Abraham Lincoln responded to Southern, Democrat-led secession with a successful war that preserved the union and freed the slaves.

After Lincoln's assassination (by a Democrat), the Republican-led Congress (over the objections of the Democratic Party minority) amended the Constitution to confirm the liberation of the slaves (13th Amendment: slavery abolished), and the 14th Amendment (freed slaves are citizens equal to all citizens) and the 15th Amendment (right to vote guaranteed to freed slaves).

Southern Democrats spent the next 100 years trying to keep freed slaves down with segregation laws, poll taxes to deny the right to vote, and lynching to enforce the social order. The KKK was formed by a Democrat; no Republican has ever been a member of the KKK. This is the heritage of the Democratic Party.

In fact, the Democratic Party was formed in the first place to defend and expand slavery.

In 1840, the very first national nominating convention of the Democratic Party adopted a platform which read in part:
 
Resolved, That Congress has no power ... to interfere with or control the domestic institutions of the several states ... that all efforts by abolitionists ... made to induce Congress to interfere with questions of slavery ... are calculated ... to diminish the happiness of the people, and endanger the stability and permanency of the union."
 
continue reading at: 
Please read and share this article with everyone you know, the truth has been hidden long enough. Post this in all the black churches, and all around the black communities.
Maybe then they will understand why nothing the dems ever say they are going to do for the black populace ever comes to being, except handouts, because the dems think blacks are inferior and can't survive without them. They certainly don't want blacks to have equal opportunity. When any black person succeeds, without the dems help, they are attacked as an abberation, a mistake that never should have happened, and they must be destroyed, a la Clarence Thomas.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Illegal Census Questions, What Are They For?

Once again, our out of control government is going to take a dump on the constitution, but hey, what else is new? They have decided to use the census, which is defined in the constitution as an enumeration to determine the apportionment of representation, (how many house members and their districts), to determine how many married gays there are. Why is that germane to how many representatives a state has? Of course, it is not. They want to know so they can separate and discriminate against us.
There is no legal reason for any question other then, "how many citizens live in the house or home". Every other question is used to discriminate or favor someones pet projects. We are giving them the info needed to treat us unequally.
DO NOT ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS BUT ONE!
DO NOT HELP OUR CORRUPT GOVERNMENT DISCRIMINATE!
If you do answer any question other then the one legal question requiered, answer the "race" question. As all life spred from Africa, we are all African-Americans. Everyone should mark the African-American answer.
Just because these crooks and thieves in Washington have loaded illegal inquiries into the census, does not mean we are legally obligated to answer them. I have not answered their questions for thirty years, filling in, "none of your business" to all but one question. I was threatened by a worker, and then her supervisor, with arrest or fine, and I BEGGED them to do anything to me. They backed off and left. There is no requirement to sit for a government interrogation. If they want to interrogate me, read me my rights, and then I'll tell you to go to hell.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An Open Letter To Cheating Politicians...

...seems to be something I should have handy in my file, so that whenever the latest disgraced politician or their fanatical backers tells me "it's their private business", I can just remind them that it's nothing personal to them, just a good solid overall policy for liars.
 
To Whom It May Concern:
If  your private peccidillo had been kept private, it would be a private affair. To ask intelligent, freedom and liberty loving Americans to purposely ignore the indiscretions you have thrust into our lives, to not expect us to make a personal decision as to what we think, to not expect us to  voice that decision to you and your PR flacks doing "damage control", is ignorant. 
You people that run for public office do so as OUR REPRESENTATIVES. You do not have the luxury of living like dirtbags while REPRESENTING ME, and taking my money to do so.
Had I not known, I would willingly have remained ignorant. I am not out investigating your personal lives, because I give everyone the benefit of the doubt until proven unworthy of my trust.
You, and any other public servants out there like you, do not represent me. When found out, you will find that those you claim to represent have every right to say "NO, WE DO NOT TRUST YOU WITH OUR BUSINESS! WE ARE EMBARRASSED BY YOUR REPRESENTATION"!
Go away.
Ron Reale
realetybytes@yahoo.com
realetybytes.townhall.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Illegal "Census"

A Minn. lawmaker, Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann, has said she will only answer one question on the census. To her and all the others waking up to the abuse of the census, and how it has been bastardized into an out and out interrogation over the years, I say, "Welcome to the fight". I have only answered the one constitutionally legal question for the last three censi. I answered all other questions, "None of your damn business", NA, or "refuse to answer because you only want this information to discriminate". I argued at my door with a worker and then the supervisor, telling them to stick their threats, and begged them to charge me, to no avail.
DO NOT ANSWER ANYTHING BUT HOW MANY LIVE IN THE HOUSE. UNDER THE CENSUS, NOTHING ELSE IS LEGAL. 
They may claim different, but just because they make illegal rules, like trying to change the census into something it never was, doesn't mean we have to play. I will never answer, or give them a dime.
If they want to interrogate me for information they are using against me, read me my rights.
Ron Reale
realetybytes@yahoo.com
realetybytes.townhall.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Do Letterman And "Happy Days" Have In Common?

It is obvious Letterman has "jumped the shark". He looks at attractive women because the woman he had a child with is so ugly he makes sure he is never seen with her, and, no pictures are allowed of her and their puppy. She is such a dog, his NAMBLA contacts turned down his offers to take his kid. He waited as long as he could to marry her because he is embarrassed by her looks. He is so preoccupied with Sarah, he thinks of her and calls out Sarahs name while mating with this female dog. If his canine companion had any class, she would have left him out over his misogynistic comments, but she couldn't be sure the kennel wouldn't put her down before some other old, wrinkly, lonely guy adopted her.
If he invites the Palins on, they should demand it be live, so when Todd kicks his teeth in we can all watch. It would get her elected.
Ron Reale
realetybytes@yahoo.com
realetybytes.townhall.com
Oh yeah, if that offends anyone, I was talking about a different Letterman.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Boycott the THE ONE and His UAW Thieves

I hope all Americans will voice their disgust at the union theft of GM and Chrysler by writting their representatives and letting them know that Americans will never buy a stolen car. Obama is a thief and a fence, who just stole the property of the secured bondholders and gave it to the thugs, (that ruined the company in the first place by living well above Americas means for many years), in the union as payment for their support of his election.
All capitalists know what it is like to be hired and fired. The UAW, and their corrupt compatriots in the SEIU, have now been raised to the level of government workers. They can't be fired. We CAN fire them, and let the Socialist Thief-in Chief know that he may have won an election by hiding his radical Anti-Americanism, but we won't spend our money on thugs and socialist products.  
If the UAW lets Ford stay afloat, and help them with real compromise, buy a Ford. If the UAW keeps expecting perks like paid time for veterinary visits, and wants to hire three laid-off union thug brothers for every existing position at Ford, then buy a foreign car. Japan is still a democracy, buy their cars.
People used to say buying a car from our former enemies was "unpatriotic".
Unlike THE ONE, the UAW and SEIU, at least our former enemies are not actively striving to destroy us.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive