Apparently, some American company is making money off undergarments, (t-shirts and such), with pictures of Hindu religious figures on them. Their ministers are complaining to all these different government entities and the UN and all those other socialists that want to run the world. This is my answer to them and their supporters.

If you don't like them, (and I don't- I won't be buying them myself), then keep them out of your country, but Americans have a God-given right to be inconsiderate and make money off it. Our freedoms of speech and expression allow us to tick off anyone or thing, and our second amendment keeps people from doing anything about it.
Remember the muslims rioting over those Danish cartoons, and the violence and damage that occurred in every country that published them? Every country but America, where they knew if they pulled that crap in our streets they would be shot. I was hoping they would try and burn neighborhoods here, I was looking forward to how they responded to a free armed populace protecting their property from religious fanatics. No French we, what the muslims called rioting we would have called target practice. Unfortunatly, even the muslims were't that stupid.
No excuses or apologies necessary. Americans have no taste and crude humor. No insult was intended, but if your insulted, you have that right. Now STFU about it.
Ron Reale
realetybytes@yahoo.com

...that has no idea about the real world. It 's not hard to figure out the points she was making by reading my answers.

An answer to ELODIE, who posted on an ABC site about Mrs. Edwards being "scared of republicans", at 12:08:58 on 12/16, and could not be ignored due to the number of inaccuracies in her rant.

A) The "neocons" used the same intell the rest of the world had to run the most sucessful war in history, to the point where we have less soldiers dying during the war then die during peacetime, on a yearly basis.
 
B) The "neocons" have proudly not given American civil rights to people trying to destroy our country. It has never been done before, and should not be done now.

C) The "neocons" have nothing to do with the continuation of the warrantless searches that have been going on for decades. JFK, RFK, and Hoover were the masters in their time, yet we survived as a nation.

D) The "neocons" would love to have the Geneva Conventions enforced. Then we could just shoot these non-uniformed combatants fighting amongst the civilian population dead when found, which is what the Geneva Conventions call for. Please look it up, you look stupid thinking the Geneva Conventions protect these scum.

E) The "neocons" have nothing to do with the scientific revolt that is brewing about the Global Warming hoax. This is a UN play for our money, and must be resisted. There is not ONE working model of CO2 causing warming. The scientists that are disavowing this crap are doing so with facts, as opposed to the "consensus", without facts, of the so-called scientists who are protecting their funding by going along with this hoax. In 5 years, the people pushing this will be considered frauds and dopes, like the people pushing the "coming ice age " when I was in school in the '70s. O wait, most of them are the same frauds and dopes.

F) The "neocons" have convinced France, Germany, Britain, Australia, Japan and many other countries that we are on the right course. Some of these countries have thrown out their socialist anti-American governments recently, and come back to our side. We have fine, strong allies.

G) The "neocons" have us much more free then Europe, where, currently, Spain is complaining to the EU about a calender from another country, and is attempting to censure said calender. Is this the freedom you speak of?

Let me make this easy for you. What America does is not the business of any other country. They can either join us and help us, or they can get out of the way and leave us alone. If they attempt to interfere, as Spain is now doing with the calender of this other EU member country, they should be punished so severely they never think of bothering us again.
90 percent of the UN are countries run by military or socialist dictators. Put the UN in North Korea, they would feel right at home.
I personally could not care less how much they hate the freedom we enjoy. To me, the louder they complain and whine, the better we must be doing. They are lucky I’m not in charge, I would have nuked Fallujah the day they hung the contractors, or any other country, to save one American life.
There is not a country on this planet worth the death of one American, and those that test us should be taught to never do it again in such a way that the rest of the world vomits at the very thought of screwing with us.

Dear Elodie, the only thing you should be scared of is your ignorance of the facts of the world.
realetybytes@yahoo.com

Now that blacks are hunting whites and severly beating them on the Baltimore MTA, while screaming white hate statements, and the police are ignoring what the blacks are saying while they beat the whites, no white person should ride the Baltimore MTA.
The police put out statements that they are not treating these hate crimes as hate crimes, basically because the viuctims are white, not black. If the situation was reversed, BLACKS BEING BEATEN BY WHITES, the community and the mayor and jesse and al would be in our face every news cycle.
The mayor and the police are showing you what they think of you, white MTA riders. You are second class citizens compared to the thugs that preyed on you.
BOYCOTT THE BALTIMORE MTA!!!!
STOP GIVING THEM THE MONEY TO IGNORE AND DISCRIMINATE AGAINST YOU.
Why  do they not except what the thugs say as the reason for the beatings? Is the Mayor white or black? I don't know. Is the police cheif white or black? I don't know. Is the head of the MTA police white or black? I don't know.
But I'll bet they are black. I'm just saying. 

...are not necessarily the luckiest in the world. Streisands endorsement is exactly what Hillary needs to keep her a victim. Hillary must be the "victim" to win, always has been, always will be, (right wing conspiracy, her opponent walked across the stage and, gasp, handed her a paper! The brute!)
Victimhood is her ploy, and bringing out one of Bills conquests, that she at one time BANNED from the White House, is only to remind us of how she deserves to be president because her husband treated her so bad. Never mind the insult to feminism, but if she could not control her husband, or at least convince him to only have sex with willing participants, (at least till after the election), how is she going to convince anyone to take her seriously on the world stage.
She is the Former First Doormat, whom no man will ever respect, and no real feminist admires her or the route she has taken to get where she is. Streisand will smile and stand next to her, thinking of her time with Bill, and Hillary will look smaller and smaller to anyone with half an ounce of pride and intelligence. Those lacking that half ounce will vote for her.

Mr. Randy Capps from something called the Urban Institute complained today that agents enforcing American laws were causing "psychological damage" and other crap. I had to respond.

Dear Randy Capps:
So illegal immigrant children are being harmed by Americans enforcing the law? Then we should take all the children away from these lawbreakers for endangering these children. If they stay in mexico, their children will be fine. If they break the law, I could not care less about their children, as they did not care about them when they put them in this position. Start taking away the illegal children and then deport or jail the parents. Put the children in foster care. They can be adopted by people that will not put them at risk. Maybe that would make them stop breaking our laws. I would expand the tent city the Arizona sheriff built in the desert to hold all illegals until their home country pays to transport them back. In some cases, that would mean life in jail, especially for the mexicans, because their country obviously does not care about them. I think that would be fair, and might keep others from breaking our laws.
To paraphrase Jefferson, "millions for confinement, not a penny for helping lawbreakers".

Due to the bastardization of our citizenship and the actions of some ignorant, and or anti-American people or groups, it is time to define just who, under our founding documents, is a legal citizen. This is the proposed amendment:

Whereas, our Founding fathers did NOT declare everyone in the world "free" or "equal", we, the citizens of these United States, do declare that anywhere the words "people" and "men" appear in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, the word 'Citizens' is to be inserted.

American Constitutional rights are for American citizens. These are the prize people receive when they become US citizens. No non citizens are to be granted any rights reserved for American Citizens.  Any politician wishing to grant our cherished rights to people who have no desire to become citizens, or terrorists working to destroy this country, is at best plain stupid, and at worst traitorous.

I am tired of this politically correct crap. The people pushing open borders are traitors, including the politicians, to the American way of life. Traitors need to be tried and executed. We need to start killing the people that would turn our country over to the UN. These traitors hold their hands up, swear to uphold our laws, and then lie, lie, lie. Impeach them, try them and execute them, before it is too late. These people are trying to kill us, we must act first.This country was built by immigrants, who came here legally, signed the guest book, and became citizens. These are the people America needs. Kill the terrorists, execute the traitors, ( every politician that tried to pass the Comprehensive Immigration Act should be brought up on charges of violating their oath of office and treason, up to and including President Bush),  and lock up any illegals until their home country takes them back. If that means life in prison, tough.

With their sponsorship of the disgusting S&M street fair in San Franwierdo,  Miller Brewing shows its utter contempt for the average American family. By supporting people, (or things) like this, that want to destroy marraige and promote adults having sex with children, Miller has chosen its important demographic. Lets see to it that no one else buys their product. If you own a store, please remove Millers products. If you are just A BEER LOVIN' KINDA GUY OR GAL, THERE ARE DOZENS OF OTHER BRANDS TO CHOSE FROM.
Don't let Miller think they can spit on our society and go unpunished. Let San Francisco be the last place they sell beer before they go broke.
Michelle Malkin has been doing great work on this story on her blog, go check it out and support her great work.
BOYCOTT MILLER BREWING CO!
Ron Reale
realetybytes@yahoo.com    
http://realetybytes.townhall.com

 

Sunday, September 30, 2007 6:17 PM

John McCain declared he would not want to see a muslim president, but did not expound on his remarks. Mr. Ibrahim Hooper of CAIR is all upset by Mr. McCains remarks, and actually invoked American "Religious Pluralism and Inclusion" in his disparaging remarks.
I sent the following remarks to Mr. Ibrahim Hooper and CAIR moments ago, expounding on behalf of Mr. McCain, if as an American, I may be so bold.
Religious pluralism and inclusion
Your Mr. Hooper actually used those words, condemning John McCain for his "no muslim" president comment.
Your inclusion complaint obviously does not include women, who are not included in anything in your home countries. Your religious pluralism is supposed to make us think McCain is wrong. I don't want a president that believes in any religion so much that he even speaks of it from the oval office. Your religion must subjugate or kill anyone that it meets. Thats how your eloquent spokesperson, that cute little smurf Ahedinajad or however its spelled, means to have peace . Killing everyone that disagrees with him, bringing back the twelfth mahdi, and subjugating the earth under islam. Do you not see the basic contradiction between defending our constitution, you know, that "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness " stuff, and kill everyone that isn't like us, that a poor, peace loving muslim American president would face? How can you suggest that McCain is wrong, when our very founding documents preclude anyone of your fine, peace loving religion from placing a hand on the bible and swearing an oath of office. You can't take oaths, can you? You people refuse to even spy on criminal muslims when you have become FBI agents, yet you want to have someone of your fine, peace loving religion defend the country. How your Mr. Ibrahim Hooper can even keep a straight face when he speaks the absurdities of his complaints is beyond me. The day a muslim is elected president will be a day there is no country to preside over. However much you lie and say different, you and yours do not belong in a free society, because from the looks of your homelands, you have no idea what freedom is, and kill anyone that desires it. Please, for all our sakes, STFU about freedom and America, two subjects you know nothing about.
realetybytes.townhall.com

 

Sunday, September 30, 2007 4:23 PM

I have tried to clear up a few things, and added some things I have learned from the local media.
I'm still crying at the images of this horrific accident on the road, involving the two vehicles in front of me, and one that crossed the median. Apparently, a southbound vehicle on Interstate 79 at mile marker 77 in West Virginia, somehow crossed the median and collided with the vehicle in the left lane about 70 yards in front of me. It was a beautiful day up to that point. I was northbound in the right lane. I remember a vehicle with a trailer going by me in the far left lane, and a few seconds later, another vehicle, (suv, jeep?) passed me in the middle lane. It's strange how our memories work. I remember that the trailer and the car in the middle lane were both red, but I can't remember what was pulling the trailer.
Whatever happened was blocked from my view from the right lane by the car and trailer. The southbound vehicle came across and struck the car with the trailer directly opposite of my position which was behind and to the right, so I did not see that impact clearly due to the angle.
Suddenly, the trailers rear rose and started to swing into the middle lane, tumbling as it went, and I could see an explosion of rubble from in front of it, as a vehicle swung into and across the middle and right lanes. As it was going across the highway, the now free trailer smashed it and disintegrated, everything but the metal frame, (it looked heavy, like a two car carrier frame), and the frame tumbled back toward the red suv, smashing it and turning it over in a flaming heap on the right shoulder of the northbound lanes. I steered across the middle and left lanes to avoid the tumbling and by now skidding trailer, stopping to block the traffic behind me.
As I stopped and started out of my vehicle, a brindle-colored dog, a greyhound or whippet, I think, ran from the suv, across the road in front of me and into the median, heading south. Believe it or not, I actually started to call soothingly to the dog for a second, before realizing how stupid that was with people in the wrecked cars waiting for help! Even though it only cost two seconds, I still felt foolish for wasting that time!
I ran to the jeep with my fire extinguisher, and as I fought the flames was calling to anyone inside. I could not see in because the windshield was crushed to the hood of the car, and the plastic door panel had fallen and was blocking the drivers window. A women cried out that, "I can't get out", and I told her in no uncertain terms, "Lady, that is NOT an option!" I managed to pull the door open but that plastic was still blocking her way. She was folded up, but alive and ready to get out. We got the plastic out of her way, and got her out of her seat belt, and she crawled out. "Where's my dog?", she asked. I told her I had seen the dog run south in the median, and she ran off after her dog. I never saw her again, I wonder if she found the dog?
I ran to the other vehicle, It was a van, I think. Nothing could prepare me for what I found. It was facing southbound on the northbound shoulder, about 20 feet north of the overturned, and by now, flame engulfed suv. There was a man sitting a little north of the vehicle, bleeding from the head (I think this man started out in the southbound vehicle, but I'm not sure). As I approached I yelled, "Are there people still in this car?" He said yes, and I went to what was the passenger side, which was facing the highway.
I could see a man moving in the passenger seat, but he was obviously not aware of his surroundings. I saw a child in the back seat, but I could not get the sliding side door open. I called for help from some people standing behind my truck, then I went to the drivers side of the vehicle. It was gone. The seat belt, having been ripped of with the roof, had decapitated the driver, a woman. I had to step over her head to help the screaming child, who had horrific facial injuries. I said to him and the man in the passenger seat, who was now moaning and moving his head around like he was trying to get his bearings, in as calm a voice I could, "it's time to go, kids", and I reached over the child to unlock the door and unhook his seat belt so he could lay across the seat. The man seemed to be coming around, and he looked to his wife,(?). He could not seem to comprehend what he saw in the drivers seat. I told him, "she can't help you sir, please unlock your door". While there was small fire in the engine compartment, it did not seem to be spreading to the vehicle body, so my main concern was opening the doors to let the help, which was starting to come from everywhere, (I could hear the sirens), get to them. I wanted so bad to help the little boy.
When I saw I could do no more, it was like a switch. One second I was acting like I knew what I was doing, then suddenly I felt like I couldn't walk. I vomited and shook for the next 45 minutes, and I am crying as I write this, a day later, with the sound of that childs screams in my head.
Why did I feel it necessary to post this gruesome story? To point out that you never know! Driving can kill you in a second. Check your tires. Watch your speed. Watch the other guy. It is not a game. Stay off the phone. Don't drink, or ride with someone that has been drinking. Do everything and anything to make sure you don't end up like these poor people through some stupid mistake. I will never be the same. I could not imagine being one of the officers or first responders that have to deal with this, and going back and seeing it again another day. I don't know how they do it. God Bless them and may their memories fade.
It is now a week later, and while I can't see things as vividly, I still hear the screams of the child. I'm not ashamed to say that it is hard to deal with.
I have learned since that this 9 year old had a 6 year old brother that I had not seen, who was ejected and killed. Last I heard, the nine year old and his dad were in intensive care.

I would like to thank all my friends who have called and offered their support to me in this very emotional time for me. I don't think I could deal with this without them, especially my parents and my Sonia. Thank you.

For a complete list of my blogs:
realetybytes.townhall.com

Realetybytes.townhall.com

Stuart M. Butler, Ph.D., is apparently a very intelligent gentlemen, who, on 10/1/2007, wrote a thoughtful and very thorough article, SCHIP Plus a Tax Credit: A Compromise Health Insurance Plan for Kids, for The Heritage Foundation Leadership for America website.

As thoughtful as it was, something seemed to be missing, so I dropped him a line. You might consider doing the same, so he knows people are actually reading this stuff, and we know what it says! 

Reporterette  rachael.uranga@dailynews.com wrote another bleeding heart story about deporting illegal aliens. She put a quote in her story from some Latino spokesperson, who proclaimed, "this is a war against immigrants." He went on to complain of the "collateral damage" done to families, when some of the deportees "are not criminals".  Of course, the reporter never pointed out that all illegal's are criminals. I dropped her a line, of course.

...Speaker Gingrich and the American Solutions group. I sent this today, 10/1/07
Sir, I am an independent conservative libertarian (hows that for a label?). I work with a broadcast and internet media outlet, <BNNreports.com>. I also work at a public television network, WXEL Boynton Beach, Fl. In this capacity, I was honored to work with General Haig on his show, World Business Review.
 I have been soliciting opinions on a campaign finance plan that would actually solve the problem without violating free speech rights. When EVERY person I have spoken to for two years agrees it is a workable, simple solution, I have to think it is a good idea! (Remember, I am a conservative working at a public tv station, and these people are really liberal- hated everything else I believe in- BUT agreed this would work).
We always hear that the commercial airwaves belong to the people. Remember Janet Jackson and the wardrobe malfunction? All we heard was "public airwaves". If they are public airwaves, then why do we give them to the FCC to sell them to commercial enterprises, (networks) to charge a fortune for our public officials to speak to us, the public? The next time the networks come for their license renewal, they should only get 363 days a year. They should pay the same as they did for they past year. They make a fortune with our public airwaves, so they should have no problem recouping what they will say is a loss of income. The other 48 hours will be used for 8 weekly 3 hour debates, (real debates, not bs soundbite crap like we have now), available to any candidates that gets the signatures to be on the ballot. All networks would carry the debates. People could watch cable if they need to get away from these important debates. The other 24 hours will be divided among the candidates for commercials. Any airlines, train, bus or other transport will get tax breaks for the amount it cost to carry the candidates to events. All candidates would have equal access to the same amount of newspaper space, with tax breaks covering the cost, ie. if the NYTimes gives an ad for a candidate that would cost $17,000.00, they will get a tax break that year for that amount. 

I know it would have been terrible for her and her family, but I wish a shot to the top of the spine had severed her nervous system before she even had a chance to touch or explain her "artwork". We would all be safer for it. Anyone considering really doing something would have seen that it is incredibly dangerous, and any other idiots would realize that the airport is not the place to show your contempt for authority. Anyone that believes she did it to show off her "artwork" is deluded. She did it to do exactly what she has done - harmed us all by making our security people needlessly hesitate now because it may be some punk just "foolin' round". Instead, she will take her 15 minutes of fame for being amazingly inconsiderate. She will gain fame from the willing traitors in the media. I see a seat on "the view". Alan Colmes will be sure to plead for police to be fired for the harassment of this poor intellectual snob who cares for no one but herself. I wish she'd been killed. 

On 9/18/07 a student was Tazored by campus police when he caused a minor disturbance at an open mike Q&A with Sen. Kerry.
If not, (and I think not!), then he should not have been tazed! When they proposed tazers for the police, it was for them to use against attackers with weapons other then firearms, so as to stop a deadly attack without having to shoot.  Regardless of politics, location or who was or was not present, any use of a tazer can only be justified if the answer to the question, "was the officers life, or anyone elses life, in danger, and was shooting the perpetrator the only other option". If the person fights, the officers fight back, and file the appropriate charges. Otherwise, we'll have a bunch of heavily armed Judge Dredd's out making sure everyone is obediant. Punishing a perp is not the cops job, but if these people get away with it, it will be. He may be a jerk, but even the Dean knows this is going to cost the school lots of money in an abuse of power and police brutality lawsuit, not to mention civil rights violations.
realetybytes.townhall.com

If only it was the beginning of a media trend. Studio execs know that people from both sides of the political spectrum watch their shows. Considering the statistics, two-thirds of the country doesn't pay attention to politics, ever, so your actors are more likely to lose you money and advertisers when they spout off, then attract any net gain, (unless bad publicity is considered a gain). Just blacking out their  inappropriate remarks helps keep attention on the actual show, not some self-important actors latest pet project. If the actor has a problem with that, go on the news and talk shows and complain. Thats where they belonged in the first place!
Thank God someone has finally figured out that when you are watching entertainment, you expect entertainment. I don't care what any narcissistic actor thinks about foreign affairs. The night was for us to make fun of these self-important egomaniacs as they tell each other how special they are, not politics. If she wants to say something to the nation, I understand the NYTimes will sell her a full page add for 65,000 dollars. Stars have every right to speak out about what they believe, like anyone else. They don't have the right to hijack an audience that is there for something entirely different. These dopes that can't even remember their prerehearsed script, (I mean, she only had, what, MONTHS to remember that tripe, and she forgot halfway through. Thats how important it was to her. SHE couldn't even remember it!), have the gall to start preaching to people that actually work for a living? Hey, Hollywood, do what you do, make us laugh, cry, scream and dance, but unless your running for office and ready to subject your ideas to open debate with a willing audience, STFU. Bravo, Fox entertainment for not being dragged into the political arena. The sad thing is, now she will get what she wants, publicity, but at least it will be on Fox News and political shows, where it belongs.
Ron Reale realetybytes.townhall.com