About Me

Name: realetybytes
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Dear Washington Post Ombudsman, I'm SHOCKED, SHOCKED...

An open letter to the Washington Post Ombudsman, Deborah Howell, who, in a surprising moment of candor, seems to have realized that her paper has been covering up for THE ONE. She seemed to be proud to make a self critical analysis at this late date, never mentioning the disgusting results of her papers failure to do even the slightest investigation of this Chicago thug, like she wanted credit for this epiffany. 
 
Dear Washington Post Ombudsman, I'm SHOCKED, SHOCKED...
...that you would actually admit what all good Americans have known for two years - you people are liars, and did everything you could to get him elected, knowing nothing abut his truley unsavory past.

Do you think by admiting this now, you regain some sense of respect? In the words of that great thinker, Tony Soprano, "FUGGETTABOUTIT!" Your disrespect for the people, your abrogatting your responsibility to act as a check against just this occurance, your helping elect a Chicago thug, and I say that with all the connotations attached, he is no better then a union thug of the past, (o wait, no secret vote for unions anymore, the union thugs are back), prove that you should just fold the paper or fire the editors that allowed you to sink to the level you seem to have just discovered, before even thinking of regaining some credibility.

Are you now going to look into this mans past for real, like who paid for his education, (Harvard, specifically), his trips to Pakistan, his real birthplace, (I especially look forward to the interview with his grandmother, who insists she was at his birth in KENYA!), or his Indonesian citizenship, necessary for him to have lived there and gone to the muslim school, so that you can destroy this insult to capitalism and American individualism and seem like the hero in the end?

Your admission today makes you look twice as corrupt as we knew you were.

Did they hire you today? Where the hell were you for the past two years?

You should have gone with the old adage, "better to remain silent and be thought a fool, then to speak and remove all doubt."

Ron Reale
realetybytes@yahoo.com
http://realetybytes.townhall.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Censureship at Boston Herald - Truth is Abuse!

The Boston Herald, in a glowing story about Barney Frank speaking at Boston College, pointed out how Mr. Franks had a plan to solve the banking problems. (Of course, they neglected to point out that Mr. Franks was a direct cause of said problem!) When I posted the response below, it was immediately removed, and my posting priveleges revoked for, "abuse". Another example of the liberal media redefining our language to protect criminals and socialist policies, like the recent media mental midget that said if you use the word "socialist" you are a racist! Anything to keep the facts out and liberal agendas in.
 
I guess pointing out how Mr. Franks has used his homosexual orientation to sleep with Fannie Mae execs and run male prostitution rings from his house has to be censured by this site, even though it is directly connected to the debacle Mr. Franks now claims he will fix. The Boston Herald, and its protection of this corrupt politician, is equally responsible for the collapse of the banking institutions, because they protect this man and helped keep him there to do these crimes. It is a fact that Mr. Franks was sleeping with a male Fannie Mae exec. The Boston Herald is a disgrace for its position on Franks, (or is one of their execs receiving the same treatment from Franks for the protection?). They should just change from a newspaper to a PR department for socialists and perverts. Now you can censure this, too.
Ron Reale
 
The last line, "Now you can censure this, too", was alluding to the fact that they, (the Herald), had removed my previous post on the same subject.
rr
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An Open Letter To Democrat Representative Tim Mahoney

Mr. Mahoney has been paying blackmail money to his mistress, with the approval of  top dems, to keep his affair quiet. His website asks people to "spread the word" about him to our friends. I am happy to do so....

I am going to spread the message that you are a disgusting hypocrite that can't keep it in your pants, an adulterer that deserves to be in jail for violating the public trust and paying a blackmailer. If you had one iota of ethics, you would step down, but your a democrat, so disgusting behavior is the norm for you and your ilk. I will tell all that you should be shunned, at the very least. Your poor wife should cut off your manhood while you sleep, pervert.
Ron Reale
realetybytes@yahoo.com
also posted at realetybytes.townhall.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Federalist #3 - John Jay and Obama

It is interesting to note what was thought of those with the limited experience of someone like Obama by John Jay, in Federalist Paper #3:
 
"When once an efficient national government is established, the best men in the country wil not only consent to serve, but also will generally be appointed to manage it; for, although town or country, or other contracted influence, may place men in State assemblies, or senates, or courts of justice, or executive departments, yet more general and extensive reputation for talents and other qualifications will be necessary to recommend men to offices under the national government-especially as it will have the widest field for choice, and never experience that want of proper persons which is not uncommon in some of the States. Hence, it will result that the administration, the political counsels, and the judicial decisions of the national government will be more wise, systematical, and judicious than those of individual States, and consequently more satisfactory with respect to other nations, as well as more safe with respect to us."
 
National experience counts, and other then running for president, THE ONE hasn't got any.
 
Ron Reale
realetybytes.townhall.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mike Lupica, RACIST

Regarding Mike Lupica and his insulting political statements to Matt Lauer this morning, concerning THE ONE and the party THE ONE represents:
Sir, (and in addressing you that way, I have already shown you more respect then you have shown 50% of the country),
I am really tired of people who know politics, or people like you, who think they know politics, accusing me of being a racist because I will not vote for this particular socialist black man.
I would vote for Michael Steele, JC Watts, or many others, who love America AS IT IS, and do not wish to make us a European socialist sewer.
Your statement to Matt Lauer was sophomoric and insulting to me.
I know you think that because you agree with his anti-American socialist policies, you like THE ONE, but does that mean that anyone who disagrees with you does so out of racism, as you implied?
Why can't you just say that, without calling everyone who will not vote for him racists?
Why will this election be about race? Because 97% of the blacks will vote for THE ONE, without regard to his policies?
I will not list all the reasons here, but if you are as intelligent as you think you are, why not check out my blog, "realetybytes.townhall.com", where you will find many reasons not to vote for THE ONE.
The fact that he is a democrat, and the democrats are directly responsible for the economic debacle we face today, (Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 and 1997, by Carter and Clinton, and the 17 times the Bush administration warned of this problem and were ignored and personally attacked and insulted by Meeks, Dodd, Franks, Pelosi and Reid), are pretty good reasons not to be anxious to vote this corrupt party into power, whatever color they are.
If you wish to see facts, as to dates and the attempts to fix this that were rebuffed by the corrupt dems, read my last few blogs. The facts are there, from the public record. I know that might strain your obviously overloaded mind, but check out the facts before you make a fool of yourself, (too late!), and stop calling good Americans RACISTS.
This is not about "whether Americans will vote for a black man", this is about whether Americans will vote for a socialist.
BTW, the fact that he has been in business with a man that tried to kill my dad only colors my opinion slightly. I am posting this letter on my blog, and sending it too all the newspapers you write for.
Ron Reale
realetybytes@yahoo.com
realetybytes.townhall.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dear Dirtbags at the "Missouri Ethics Commission"....

   ...This is to let you know that I have a blog, readily available to anyone in the state of Missouri, which tells the truth about THE ONE. I dare you to do anything about it, you BROWN SHIRT NAZIS! Go fornicate yourselves.
 
With absolutely no respect at all,
 
Ron Reale
realetybytes.townhall.com
 
I sent this to the so-called Missouri Ethics Commission, which can be reached at  "helpdesk@mec.mo.gov". Please tell them what you think of their outrageous behavior, of which the Governor of Missouri has said:

“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his
Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.

“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.

“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson . I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson ’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.

“Barack Obama needs to grow up. Leftist blogs and others in the press constantly say false things about me and my family. Usually, we ignore false and scurrilous accusations because the purveyors have no credibility. When necessary, we refute them. Enlisting Missouri law enforcement to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts - not a free society.”

The Governor is right, these people are disgustingly Anti-American, but what do you expect from people that say they love America, as long as they can change it into a European socialist sewer.
 
RR

 


 

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Anybody Tells You The Current Economic Issues Are Bush's Problem, Send Them This... -

This incredibly accurate article was published today, 9/24, at 1:59, by Louise Hertzog on "the Hill's Blog Briefing Room", http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2008/09/24/reid-bush-guilty-of-fiscal-dereliction-of-duty/#comment-62429.
These are not my words, but I wish they were. It is an incredibly well researched article. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did. RR
  •  

    White House warned congress 17 times about problems with Fannie and Freddie
    September 22, 2008 - 11:07 ET

    For many years the President and his Administration have not only warned of the systemic consequences of financial turmoil at a housing government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) but also put forward thoughtful plans to reduce the risk that either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would encounter such difficulties. President Bush publicly called for GSE reform 17 times in 2008 alone before Congress acted. Unfortunately, these warnings went unheeded, as the President's repeated attempts to reform the supervision of these entities were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems.

    2001

    April: The Administration's FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is "a potential problem," because "financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity."

    2002

    May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)

    2003

    January: Freddie Mac announces it has to restate financial results for the previous three years.

    February: The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) releases a report explaining that "although investors perceive an implicit Federal guarantee of [GSE] obligations," "the government has provided no explicit legal backing for them." As a consequence, unexpected problems at a GSE could immediately spread into financial sectors beyond the housing market. ("Systemic Risk: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Role of OFHEO," OFHEO Report, 2/4/03)

    September: Fannie Mae discloses SEC investigation and acknowledges OFHEO's review found earnings manipulations.

    September: Treasury Secretary John Snow testifies before the House Financial Services Committee to recommend that Congress enact "legislation to create a new Federal agency to regulate and supervise the financial activities of our housing-related government sponsored enterprises" and set prudent and appropriate minimum capital adequacy requirements.

    October: Fannie Mae discloses $1.2 billion accounting error.

    November: Council of the Economic Advisers (CEA) Chairman Greg Mankiw explains that any "legislation to reform GSE regulation should empower the new regulator with sufficient strength and credibility to reduce systemic risk." To reduce the potential for systemic instability, the regulator would have "broad authority to set both risk-based and minimum capital standards" and "receivership powers necessary to wind down the affairs of a troubled GSE." (N. Gregory Mankiw, Remarks At The Conference Of State Bank Supervisors State Banking Summit And Leadership, 11/6/03)

    2004

    February: The President's FY05 Budget again highlights the risk posed by the explosive growth of the GSEs and their low levels of required capital, and called for creation of a new, world-class regulator: "The Administration has determined that the safety and soundness regulators of the housing GSEs lack sufficient power and stature to meet their responsibilities, and therefore…should be replaced with a new strengthened regulator." (2005 Budget Analytic Perspectives, pg. 83)

    February: CEA Chairman Mankiw cautions Congress to "not take [the financial market's] strength for granted." Again, the call from the Administration was to reduce this risk by "ensuring that the housing GSEs are overseen by an effective regulator." (N. Gregory Mankiw, Op-Ed, "Keeping Fannie And Freddie's House In Order," Financial Times, 2/24/04)

    June: Deputy Secretary of Treasury Samuel Bodman spotlights the risk posed by the GSEs and called for reform, saying "We do not have a world-class system of supervision of the housing government sponsored enterprises (GSEs), even though the importance of the housing financial system that the GSEs serve demands the best in supervision to ensure the long-term vitality of that system. Therefore, the Administration has called for a new, first class, regulatory supervisor for the three housing GSEs: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banking System." (Samuel Bodman, House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Testimony, 6/16/04)

    2005

    April: Treasury Secretary John Snow repeats his call for GSE reform, saying "Events that have transpired since I testified before this Committee in 2003 reinforce concerns over the systemic risks posed by the GSEs and further highlight the need for real GSE reform to ensure that our housing finance system remains a strong and vibrant source of funding for expanding homeownership opportunities in America… Half-measures will only exacerbate the risks to our financial system." (Secretary John W. Snow, "Testimony Before The U.S. House Financial Services Committee," 4/13/05)

    2007

    July: Two Bear Stearns hedge funds invested in mortgage securities collapse.

    August: President Bush emphatically calls on Congress to pass a reform package for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, saying "first things first when it comes to those two institutions. Congress needs to get them reformed, get them streamlined, get them focused, and then I will consider other options." (President George W. Bush, Press Conference, The White House, 8/9/07)

    September: RealtyTrac announces foreclosure filings up 243,000 in August – up 115 percent from the year before.

    September: Single-family existing home sales decreases 7.5 percent from the previous month – the lowest level in nine years. Median sale price of existing homes fell six percent from the year before.

    December: President Bush again warns Congress of the need to pass legislation reforming GSEs, saying "These institutions provide liquidity in the mortgage market that benefits millions of homeowners, and it is vital they operate safely and operate soundly. So I've called on Congress to pass legislation that strengthens independent regulation of the GSEs – and ensures they focus on their important housing mission. The GSE reform bill passed by the House earlier this year is a good start. But the Senate has not acted. And the United States Senate needs to pass this legislation soon." (President George W. Bush, Discusses Housing, The White House, 12/6/07)

    2008

    January: Bank of America announces it will buy Countrywide.

    January: Citigroup announces mortgage portfolio lost $18.1 billion in value.

    February: Assistant Secretary David Nason reiterates the urgency of reforms, says "A new regulatory structure for the housing GSEs is essential if these entities are to continue to perform their public mission successfully." (David Nason, Testimony On Reforming GSE Regulation, Senate Committee On Banking, Housing And Urban Affairs, 2/7/08)

    March: Bear Stearns announces it will sell itself to JPMorgan Chase.

    March: President Bush calls on Congress to take action and "move forward with reforms on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They need to continue to modernize the FHA, as well as allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to homeowners to refinance their mortgages." (President George W. Bush, Remarks To The Economic Club Of New York, New York, NY, 3/14/08)

    April: President Bush urges Congress to pass the much needed legislation and "modernize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. [There are] constructive things Congress can do that will encourage the housing market to correct quickly by … helping people stay in their homes." (President George W. Bush, Meeting With Cabinet, the White House, 4/14/08)

    May: President Bush issues several pleas to Congress to pass legislation reforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before the situation deteriorates further.

    "Americans are concerned about making their mortgage payments and keeping their homes. Yet Congress has failed to pass legislation I have repeatedly requested to modernize the Federal Housing Administration that will help more families stay in their homes, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance sub-prime loans." (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/3/08)
    "[T]he government ought to be helping creditworthy people stay in their homes. And one way we can do that – and Congress is making progress on this – is the reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That reform will come with a strong, independent regulator." (President George W. Bush, Meeting With The Secretary Of The Treasury, the White House, 5/19/08)
    Congress needs to pass legislation to modernize the Federal Housing Administration, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance subprime loans." (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/31/08)
    June: As foreclosure rates continued to rise in the first quarter, the President once again asks Congress to take the necessary measures to address this challenge, saying "we need to pass legislation to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac." (President George W. Bush, Remarks At Swearing In Ceremony For Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development, Washington, D.C., 6/6/08)

    July: Congress heeds the President's call for action and passes reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as it becomes clear that the institutions are failing.

    Comment by Louise Hertzog — September 24, 2008 @ 1:59 pm  Comment stolen by realetybytes from "the Hill" Blog, because it deserves a wider audience.

  • Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Is Jack Cafferty of CNN Really THAT Ignorant?

    Mr. Cafferty seems to think there is no other reason intelligent people in this country will not vote for THE ONE but race. Many others in the anti-American Main Street Media are also wringing their hands, saying, "but THE ONE wants change, so it must be race!"
    Are they really that ignorant?
    Do they really think THE ONE's lack of experience or legislative record is not enough for good people to say NO?
    Do they really think THE ONE's stance on letting newborn babies die without medical assistance is not enough for good people to say NO?
    Do they really think THE ONE's associations with unrepentant terrorists, (and his continually lying about the depth of his relationship with them, check out the Annenberg papers, they prove THE ONE is a liar), is not enough for good people to say NO?
    How about THE ONE deciding that even though the Bush Tax cuts bring in 20% more tax money than without them, THE ONE will still repeal them, almost certainly causing the recession Bush has avoided. That is not enough for good people to say NO?
    How about THE ONE wanting to give hundreds of billions of tax dollars to fund failure, rather then letting private industry create what is needed, in the form of research grants for alternate fuels that do not work, and may never. Is that not enough to say NO?
    THE ONE wants to demonize the oil industry, which has helped make America the greatest, most powerful nation on earth, take its money, and give it to people that pay no taxes. The fact that that will not produce one ounce of oil or drop the price of gas is obvious to good Americans, is that not enough of a reason to say NO? 
    THE ONE wants a medical system rivaling those going bankrupt and letting people die in Europe and Canada, is that not enough to scare good people to say NO?
    As any thinking American can see, there are a myriad of good reasons not to vote for someone that holds capitalism in such low regard. Good people will say NO, not because THE ONE is black, but because every time he opens his mouth, he talks about radical anti-American socialist "change". Good people will say no to "change" that makes America a sewer like the rest of the worlds socialist, communist countries THE ONE admires so much.
    Cafferty and the rest of the Main Street Media will realize someday that Americans love this country, and wish to fix the current system, not trash it and become a European satellite.
    Ron Reale
    realetybytes.townhall.com  
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Pelosi: Dems bear no responsibility for economic crisis...REALLY?

    The Community Reinvestment Act of 1997 proves she is lying, as usual. Please check it out. It is the reason all of the banks are failing.
     
    Ron Reale
    realetybytes.townhall.com
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Voter Roll Purges, Good! Make ACORN Work Harder To Steal Elections!

    Some socialist liberal, (my description, not his, but he does go out of his way to give what HE thinks is validity to his name by pointing out he is "Robert Kennedy Jr's partner", so I know he ain't no America loving conservative), by the name of Greg Palast, complaining about America, as usual, has pointed out that the Secretary of State of Colorado, Florida, Ohio and Nevada are purging voters from the rolls of their states. In his rant, he just says it is happening, but not why. Obviously, the why does not match his agenda, or he would have mentioned it, but no, the fair way for liberals is to state what they want and hide the facts that prove them wrong or culpable, (kinda like Obama and his war against anyone mentioning his years of close up work and ties to the unrepentant terrorist Ayers, who hosted Obamas first fundraisers, getting him where he is today, not allowed to mention that, Ayers is just someone he met once is the line from Obama. That is a lie, proven by the Annenberg papers, recently released by the University of Illinos at Chicago). I, of course, never being opinionless, had to coment!

    I'm not saying whether it, (the purge) is right or wrong, but you would think, "Robert 'Hugo Chavez is my friend' Kennedy Jr's partner" could give us an idea WHY the now former voters in Colorado, New Mexico, etc. are being purged. If it was illegal, and there was no basis, I'm sure "Robert 'Hugo Chavez is my buddy' Kennedy JR's partner" would have been screaming about it. Knowing nothing about it, and learning nothing from "Robert 'Hugo Cavez is just misunderstood' Kennedy Jr's partner", I have to stand on the fact that since JFK, there has not been a Kennedy on the national scene worth wasting urine on if they were on fire, (murderers, [Teddy], rapists, [Patrick, I think, sorry if I got him confused with a different dirtbag Kennedy], and drug addicts and adulterers, [don't have my scorecard, can't remember which one was screwing his babysitter or was in and out of rehab- o wait, I think that one died], who cares what this socialist group, or their 'partners', thinks), and I bet there is a legal basis for the purges.

    Ron Reale
    realetybytes@yahoo.com
    realetybytes.townhall.com
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Whose City Is It? Hasidics, Apparently!

    NY City, where I was born, has allowed rights to one religious group that discriminates against everyone else. As usual, knowing they have the power to dictate the law to the Mayor and Governor, the Hasidics are seeking to strip more rights from the rest of the citizens. I felt compelled to comment, without asking the Hasidics for permission. I hope they don't sic the mayor on me!
     
    Sir, as a former NYker,I was wondering, now that you have thrown out the 14th amendment and discriminate against non-Hasidics on what used to be public streets, will you give certain streets to the Christians for Creche scenes and Christmas trees? 
    Should we expect Sharia law in Muslim neighborhoods? You are allowing one group to discriminate, you have opened the door for anarchy. This is NY property, not Israel. Stop this now, or you will have problems from every other discriminatory group. They have a right to their religion, of course, but they should have no veto over the rights of fellow citizens on the public streets.
    I realize that you have more important things to do then make sure your cities citizens are treated with equal protection under the law, like STOPPING THE WORLD FROM SMOKING, and TRYING TO KEEP LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS FROM BEING ABLE TO DEFEND THEMSELVES, but you might want to take a minute to remind the Hasidics that they are "the Chosen Ones" to God, not the government, and, BY LAW, they are no better then any other American citizen. They have no right to demand changes in anyones behavior on public city streets.
    Unless, of course, you agree that they ARE better then us, in which case you should immediately step down and become a Rabbi.
    Ron Reale
    realetybytes.townhall.com
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Obamas Judgement re: Hannity and KOS

    For proof of what an incredibly skilled liar THE ONE is, and what impressivilly bad judgement THE ONE has, you need not look further then the recent interview with "the Devil", Bill O'Reilly.
    The One compared, and insisted, that in his judgement, the fact-based questions Hannity has for THE ONE, (about his real relationship with Ayers and White), are the same as the slime and noxious comments you can regularly find on KOS and HUFFINGTON. O'Reilly tried to point out the difference, but THE ONE, on the verge of tears it seemed, said, "he really gives me a hard time".
    Please everyone, take an anti-nausea pill and check out those disgusting sites, along with the Move ON (General Betrayus) site.
    THE ONE is counting on your not checking the facts, just accepting his comparison. It is part of the left wing smear against Fox. (BTW, considering that Fox has been determined by numerous studies to be fair, and more people are watching Fox then all the others together, whenever THE ONE complains about Fox, he is calling us stupid.)
    Go see the difference, and then see if you think this man has the judgement to be president.
    I think not.
    If you check, you will agree.
    Hannity may be tough, but he is using facts, not evil, vicious lies like these sites.
    Check it out, please. 
     
    Ron Reale
    realetybytes.townhall.com
     
    Okay, O'Reilly isn't the Devil, and Obama wasn't real close to crying, but he was upset and hurt...sniff...sniff..mommeeeee!
    rr:-) 
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Who is Carol Fowler?

    She is the South Carolina Democrat chairwoman, wife of Don Fowler, the man taped laughing about the hurricane hitting New Orleans a couple of weeks ago. (Seems like a fun family there!) She said that Governor Palin's only qualification for VP is that she, Palin, did not have an abortion. Outrageous, even for a liberal . I had to correct the record as I could.
     
    Another mathematically challenged Democrat. I believe Governor Palin has not had 5 abortions, (about the average for a liberal), not one. Does not Chairwoman Fowler think that as long as the option is available for a working women, it should be exercized in all cases? Or has the Chairwoman ever tried to pass or promote the killing, I mean aborting, of "defective" children, only?
    They are terrified of Palin, because she loves her children, unconditionally, (didn't force an abortion on her daughter, how many libs would have gone that route to avoid being, "punished with a baby"), has a strong man at home, (not some metrosexual 1/2 woman in pants), and won't let BS into the budget.
    Ron Reale
    realetybytes.townhall.com
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Gordon Brown? What's a Gordon Brown, and Who Cares What He Thinks?

    An article today points out that some unknown named Gordon Brown from the half islamic nation, England, whose a#s we kicked for our freedom, supports THE ONE, (and progressives and democrats in general), and I felt I had to let him know how appreciative we Americans are to know his opinion.

     I hope the American President makes clear who they back in the future British elections, even though it is none of our business.
    Mr. Brown likes "progressives"? Hitler was a brown shirt "progressive".
    Mr. Brown should show some class, (if someone would teach him what class is), and STFU when it comes to other countries  democratic elections.
    It doesn't matter who our president is, we will be here to save Europes behind when, as in the past, they screw things up for the world. (WW1,WW2).
    Get it through your heads, everyone. We don't care that some socialist crackpot wants our country to emulate the sewer he lives in.
    How's your economy, Mr. Brown?
    How about your unemployment, Mr. Brown?
    The progressives and democrats you love so much have put socialist policies in place that no country can survive with. When your country gets a positive economic growth and your unemployment falls out of double digits you can talk about what great ideas "progressives and democrats" have.
    We don't want someone like Brown to give up our country to radical islamists without a fight.
    You European As#wipes can set aside sharia law enclaves because your too chickens#t to kill them all, or even get them to live by the laws of YOUR COUNTRY, but we will stick with killing those that want to destroy us.
    God Bless George Bush and the United States, and may the 50,000,000 people freed by us these past 7 years in Afghanistan and Iraq enjoy their newfound freedom and liberty. They earned it fighting with the UNITED STATES. The British fought with us, because Tony Blair had vision, guts and the balls to do what was right, which, of course, because of his lack of those qualities, Brown is trying to reverse.
    Who is Brown?
    What has Brown done for the world?
    Ron Reale
    realetybytes@yahoo.com
    realetybytes.townhall.com
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    ABC Has BBC "World Wants Obama" Poll...SO WHAT!!!

    When I first posted this, I was mistaken about exactly who had commisioned this poll. I incorrectly stated it was an ABC poll. It was not. It was a BBC poll, with the results being published on an ABC site I came across.
    I apologize for the mistake. RR
     
    If the World wants Obama,  McCain is obviously the right choice for America. 
    Who cares what the "world" wants? Americans don't.
    Obviously, The BBC does. 
    With the exception of Australia and England, there is not one country whose opinion America needs to pay attention to. These dictators, kings and commies want us dead, and WE should care who THEY want as OUR president? I think not!
    Whats up BBC? Do you think America cares who Lebanese terrorists and Russians or European wimps want as our president? 
    Why don't you just poll Liberals and the American main stream media? They hate America as much as the rest of these despots you polled, and you could have saved the money for the trip.
    BBC, poll this question:
    Should the United States pull out of the UN, form an Association of Democracies, sell our weapons ONLY to those democracies, and NEVER deal with any other country in the world, EXCEPT to bomb them into the stone age if they
    screw with us or our allies, and give not one cent in aid to anyone but our allies?
    Go ahead, poll that, you unAmerican socialists.
     
    Ron Reale
    realetybytes.townhall.com 
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive